To what extent were successes or failures a result of factors other than the strategy. Finally, we listed the study design options that may be considered to answer the evaluation questions.
Around —9, funding levels to support iCCM expansion in sub—Saharan Africa increased substantially. Collecting Process Data The process evaluation should begin during the program planning phase and continue through program implementation.
If more than one person collects data, each must follow the same rules and use the same definitions. Examples of unintended but anticipated effects are: Aimee WickmanProcess and Outcome Evaluations If data are collected over a long period, the same rules and definitions must be used throughout.
Was the program more successful with certain groups of people than with others. The demonstration sites were required to submit their evaluation reports in their 18th month. Outcome evaluations focus on difficult questions that ask what happened to program participants and how much of a difference the program made for them.
The evaluation can assess whether the unintended effects occurred. If not, what remains to be done. The publication outlines a conceptual model to measure the prevalence of actual intimidation in any jurisdiction.
What was the level of resident support in targeted neighborhoods. For example, one of the objectives of the My-Peer project is to provide a safe space and learning environment for young people, without fear of judgment, misunderstanding, harassment or abuse.
These data will help determine whether program outcomes may be expected in similar jurisdictions. Another possible comparison group is a similar, nearby community. The second data source includes interviews with and observations of participants.
For most jurisdictions, statistical significance will be less important than other considerations, such as if the program effect was large enough to make a substantial difference and if enough benefits were derived to justify program costs.
To answer these questions, a two-stage approach to evaluation is used. The importance of ensuring fidelity to the model and applying sanctions and incentives consistently were among the major findings of the study. With regard to process data, 22 of the studies collected sufficient information to report on implementation strength, and all, except one, could report on program implementation.
For example, one of the objectives of the My-Peer project is to provide a safe space and learning environment for young people, without fear of judgment, misunderstanding, harassment or abuse.
Types of Evaluation Process Evaluation determines whether program activities have been implemented as intended and resulted in certain outputs. You may conduct process evaluation periodically throughout the life of your program and start by reviewing the Outcome Evaluation measures program effects in the target population by assessing.
While process and outcome evaluations are the most common, there are several other types of evaluation questions that are central to a specific program evaluation. These include the following: Efficiency: Are your program’s activities being produced with.
Nonprofit personnel do not have to be experts in outcomes-based evaluation in order to carry out a useful outcomes evaluation plan.
In most major activities in life and work, there is a "20% of effort that generates 80% of the results". Process evaluations help stakeholders see how a program outcome or impact was achieved.
Impact or outcome evaluations are undertaken when it is important to know whether and how well the objectives of a project or program were met. Often a process evaluation can set the stage for an outcome evaluation.
Ultimately, process and outcome evaluations have a range of practical purposes, including providing data to appropriately modify an existing program and producing evidence of promising practices.
Different Types of Evaluation Once you pinpoint the reason for conducting your evaluation and the target population, you can better determine the most appropriate type of evaluation. This section describes the five major types of evaluations and the appropriate circumstances for their uses.Process and outcome evaluations